Le blog de Olivier Crête



May 2005
« Apr   Jun »

RSS 2.0

Log in

Today, there was a meeting of the Gentoo/AMD64 team to discuss the blubb/dang proposal to support support multilib, but the meeting didn’t get much resolved since eradicator (our multilib man) could not there. I find funny that this proposal has quite a few things in common with my June 2003 proposal: allowing every lib to be built for both API’s, maintaining dep trees for both. Its also funny that killing multilib and chroots are also proposed/rejected. But we’ve had progress since 2003, we have get_libdir() and all of eradicator’s great work. Its nice that we are now discussing minor details like the -config files (like gtk-config, etc)

I find blubb proposal too complicated. Instead of modifying every -config (that’s crazy) or putting both 32bit and64bit -config files in special directories and replacing them in bin/ with special wrappers. Or having a special portage wrapper for each of them.. which would anyway break when they are called inside configure script, etc.. Or would be hard to implement for non-portage builds. We could leave the 64bit ones where they belong (in /usr/bin) and put the 32bit ones somewhere else (lets say /usr/bin/32bitconfigfiles/), with the same name. And then when we want to build a 32bit application, we can just put that directory in the PATH before the /usr/bin.. and there you go, problem solved. We should probably even provide some kind of non-portage script (lets call it build32) that would set PKG_CONFIG_PATH, PATH, a gcc=i686-gcc alias, etc to make building 32bit easy.

One answer to “New multilib proposals”

No avatar
Sebastien dit:

Former Linux Architect Moves to Microsoft: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1827841,00.asp
Daniel Robbins doit trouver Windows tellement impossible à utiliser! Gentoo c’est tellement mieux! (right…)

PS: On dirait ben que travailler gratuitement c’est pas pratique dans la VRAIE vie! 🙂

Write a comment:

: (required)


This page is XHTML 1.0 Strict and CSS level 3